The Witness Box

Commenting on expert evidence, economic damages, and interesting developments in injury, wrongful death, business torts, discrimination, and wage and hour lawsuits

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Economist Daubert Watch: Passing thru the gate

(Experts from Dauberttracker.com)

Case 1: Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.

Court says: Criticism by attorneys not enough for Daubert; plaintiff's economic expert can testify because defendant's failed to introduce opposing economic expert report;

See:
Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.
Date of Decision: 6/20/2005
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: C-03-4244 MMC
Court: California, Northern District
Area of Law: Corporate Law


Case 2: Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.

Court says: Relying on the work of other experts does not make defendant's expert report inadmissible

Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.
Date of Decision: 3/5/2007
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: 1:04-cv-01587-TAB-RLY
Court: Indiana, Southern District
Area of Law: Insurance Law

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home