Economist Daubert Watch: Passing thru the gate
(Experts from Dauberttracker.com)
Case 1: Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.
Court says: Criticism by attorneys not enough for Daubert; plaintiff's economic expert can testify because defendant's failed to introduce opposing economic expert report;
See:
Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.
Date of Decision: 6/20/2005
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: C-03-4244 MMC
Court: California, Northern District
Area of Law: Corporate Law
Case 2: Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.
Court says: Relying on the work of other experts does not make defendant's expert report inadmissible
Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.
Date of Decision: 3/5/2007
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: 1:04-cv-01587-TAB-RLY
Court: Indiana, Southern District
Area of Law: Insurance Law
Case 1: Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.
Court says: Criticism by attorneys not enough for Daubert; plaintiff's economic expert can testify because defendant's failed to introduce opposing economic expert report;
See:
Sharp Corp. vs. Au Optronics Corp.
Date of Decision: 6/20/2005
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: C-03-4244 MMC
Court: California, Northern District
Area of Law: Corporate Law
Case 2: Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.
Court says: Relying on the work of other experts does not make defendant's expert report inadmissible
Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. vs. Conseco Med. Ins. Co.
Date of Decision: 3/5/2007
Jurisdiction: Federal
Docket Numbers: 1:04-cv-01587-TAB-RLY
Court: Indiana, Southern District
Area of Law: Insurance Law
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home