Testimony on Discriminatory Sales Lead System Stands
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, employment cases, gender
Commenting on expert evidence, economic damages, and interesting developments in injury, wrongful death, business torts, discrimination, and wage and hour lawsuits
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, employment cases, gender
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, wage and hour
Labels: admissibility, Daubert, international damages
Labels: Daubert, statistical evidence, surveys, wage and hour
Labels: Daubert, statistical evidence, surveys, wage and hour
Labels: admissibility, attorneys on experts, courts on experts, Daubert
The plaintiff would like to have her expert testify about the extent of
sex based stereotyping in the United States and its workplaces, the meaning of certain words (for example, that “Bless you” in the context in which Miller
said it shows sexual stereotyping; likewise for the other supervisor’s
comment about child discipline strategy), and that it is very unlikely that a
man would have been told that he had too much on his plate because of school
and children. For the reasons I describe below, I conclude that the expert’s
testimony would not be helpful to a fact finder on the issues that are relevant to this decision....
The proposed expert testimony about the prevalence of sex-based stereotypes
in America is no substitute for actual evidence (direct or circumstantial)
about these decision makers and their beliefs and behaviors. The expert,
whatever her professional credentials, is not competent to testify about what these supervisors meant, consciously or unconsciously, in using certain words.
Labels: Daubert, employment cases
Labels: Damage awards, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: attorneys on experts, Damage awards, Daubert, expert testimony experiences
Labels: Daubert, expert testimony experiences, experts on experts
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, personal injury, police
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, statistical evidence
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert, employment cases
Labels: courts, Damage awards, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: attorneys on experts, Daubert
Labels: Daubert, hot research
Labels: admissibility, Daubert
Labels: admissibility, Daubert, statistical evidence
Labels: admissibility, courts, Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Damage awards, Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Damage awards, Daubert
Labels: courts on experts, Daubert
Labels: Daubert
Labels: Daubert