The Witness Box

Commenting on expert evidence, economic damages, and interesting developments in injury, wrongful death, business torts, discrimination, and wage and hour lawsuits

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Are damages in employment discrimination cases going to get more complicated?

Supreme Court gets 42 USC 1981 case


Interesting case suggests that damages in employment cases may get more complicated. If the Supreme Court upholds the 9th Circuit's decision there may be an increase in the number of cases involving businesses; esp. closely held businesses that are owned and operated by minorities. Economic damages in these types of cases would basically involve a valuation of a business or loss profits which all else equal tends to be more involved than lost wage calculations.

Read More....(see below)

Supreme Court gets 42 USC 1981 case By Ross Runkel on Discrimination - Race Section 1981 prohibits race discrimination in the formation, termination, and performance of contracts.
Can a person who is not a contracting party recover under 1981?

That's what the US Supreme Court will decide in Domino's Pizza v. McDonald, Docket No. 04-593, certiorari granted April 25, 2005. The allegations were: McDonald, an African American, was the president and main shareholder of JWM, a corporation. JWM entered into contracts with Domino's. Domino's made it difficult or impossible for JWM to perform, propelling JWM into bankruptcy. JWM and Domino's settled. McDonald sued Domino's under Section 1981 claiming financial and emotional loss. He claimed that the downfall of JWM was caused by racial discrimination on the part of Domino's. The allegation have not been proved. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Domino's.

The 9th Circuit reversed, saying that McDonald, even though he personally had no contractual relationship with Domino's, had standing to sue Domino's for alleged injuries that he personally suffered. The 9th Circuit's decision (07/18/2004) was not reported. See 2004 WL 1380296. The 9th Circuit relied on its earlier case Gomez v. Alexian Bros. Hosp., 698 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir 1983). The Circuits are split on this theory. See Guides Ltd v. Yarmouth Group, 295 F.3d 1065 (10th Cir 2002).

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home